When headcount or roles shift mid-quarter, coverage realignment often lags by weeks, leaving high-value accounts unattended and pipeline creation to stall. Build territory updates on a fixed cadence so models adjust immediately when seats open, overlays spin up, or segments change.
Data is often distributed across customer relationship management (CRM) systems, human resources information systems (HRIS), and finance systems, which makes maintaining a single source of truth more difficult.
Leaders are contending with tighter controls, such as board reviews, SOX/ICFR checks, and compensation audits, that often require versioned plans, effective dates, documented approvals, and traceable changes to crediting. In this environment, spreadsheets and disconnected point solutions can slow replans, hide risk, and increase dispute potential.
If your team revisits territories and quotas midcycle, you likely need faster access to planning data, forecasts, and payout implications in one place. Modern sales planning tools can enhance predictability and profitability, particularly when artificial intelligence is integrated into daily workflows.
The tools that tend to help enterprise teams bring together:
Below, we summarize the leading sales planning tools using recent user feedback, and note where each option may fit best in an enterprise context.
Disclaimer: Varicent is not asserting feature parity with any other software described in this article; each section reflects publicly available vendor documentation and G2 reviews accessed as of August 2025.
If you’re planning across thousands of accounts, multiple hierarchies, and complex crediting, Varicent is built for that scale.
Independent analysts have recently recognized Varicent as a leader in sales performance management for incentive compensation, aligning with the platform's focus on large and complex sales organizations. Forrester noted it was “the only solution evaluated with an in-depth set of AI capabilities” and “a strong fit for sales teams looking to use advanced SPM/ICM capabilities to bring out the best in their sales organization.”
To learn more about why Forrester named Varicent a leader, review The Forrester Wave™ for Sales Performance Management Solutions for Incentive Compensation, Q1 2025.
Varicent’s Artificial Intelligence is embedded in planning and data transformation, including generative AI-based sales planning and extract, load, and transform (ELT) assistants that help teams realign territories, identify at-risk coverage, and surface opportunities faster, all within Varicent’s secure environment.
Admins can also use the in-product Sales Planning Software to query data and execute actions, with a clear audit trail of what the Assistant has done.
Sales Planning supports in-year territory and quota changes, scenario modeling, and approval flows. Many changes can be performed by admins, which can reduce time-to-change compared to service-heavy approaches.
The solution also provides exportable audit trails for plan changes, moves, seller assignments, and quota adjustments, which are suitable for governance and SOX/SOC evidence.
Varicent ELT consolidates data from dozens of sources (like CRM, finance systems) and prepares it for Sales Planning and Incentives, enabling leaders to evaluate plan changes alongside their impact on payouts.
ELT includes add-ons, such as ELT Assistant and advanced algorithms, as well as versioned, reusable logic, which helps enterprises standardize transformations across teams.
Varicent brings sales planning, incentives, seller insights, AI, and ELT together, so revenue operations (RevOps), Finance, and HR can work from the same data, simulate decisions, and understand downstream effects before publishing.
Varicent documents defense-in-depth practices, maintains ISO/SOC attestations, and exposes audit trails both in Sales Planning and ELT. That combination supports audit readiness without requiring data to be pulled into offline spreadsheets.
Anaplan is a cloud-native, connected planning platform featuring an in-memory Hyperblock engine (Classic and Polaris), designed for large, multidimensional models and scenario analysis across functions such as Sales, Finance, Supply Chain, and HR.
For sales use cases, Anaplan provides territory and quota planning applications; for forecasting, PlanIQ adds ML/AI-based prediction. Recent documentation also highlights the built-in Workflow for tasking and approvals.
Anaplan is a good fit for enterprises that want a centralized center of excellence (COE), dedicated model-builder resources, and strong governance for large, connected planning initiatives.
According to recent G2 reviews:
What Users Like |
What Users Flag |
Flexibility and adaptability for varied planning use cases. |
Performance slowdowns with large models or datasets. |
Can be approachable for non-IT users; “business-owned” model building. |
Complexity that may require skilled model builders and strong governance. |
Broad modeling, customization, and connected scenarios. |
Significant initial setup effort before value is realized in complex environments. |
Automation and centralization can streamline planning cycles and improve forecasting accuracy. |
Steep learning curve for advanced modeling and at-scale governance, especially early on. |
Connected planning and integrations across functions that help teams update scenarios quickly. |
Feature gaps, some reviewers mention, relative to their needs, leading to custom builds. |
Salesforce Sales Cloud is a sales force automation platform built around CRM data, pipeline, and forecast visibility, as well as AI-assisted selling features, such as Einstein and Agentforce.
Core capabilities on the product page include lead, account, and opportunity management; forecast and pipeline management; reports and dashboards; workflow automation; territory assignment; quoting and approvals; and collaboration.
Salesforce also highlights related add-ons such as Sales AI, Sales Analytics, and Sales Performance Management.
Salesforce is geared toward CRM-centric enterprises that are standardizing on Salesforce and are willing to extend with Salesforce products or AppExchange partners for advanced planning. They may find Sales Cloud to be a strong foundation for pipeline visibility and core forecasting.
According to recent G2 reviews:
What Users Like |
What Users Flag |
Pipeline and forecast visibility that helps managers track trends and prioritize deals. |
Learning curve as processes and data structures become more complex. |
Ease of use and customizability to tailor objects, fields, and views. |
Missing features/added costs for advanced planning or forecasting are often addressed through add-ons or partner apps. |
Lead, account, and opportunity management in one place for a single customer view. |
Extensions are required for advanced use cases, such as Sales Performance Management, Sales Planning, and Revenue Intelligence. |
Reporting, dashboards, and pipeline inspection that help teams monitor trends and prioritize deals. |
Interface complexity at scale, which some users find overwhelming as processes and data expand. |
Xactly Incent is an incentive compensation software focused on automating commission calculations, providing sellers and leaders with real-time visibility into payouts, and offering admin workflows for plan changes and reporting.
Vendor materials emphasize automation, transparency, reporting, and scale. For example, large payee counts and transaction volumes.
Organizations that prioritize compensation-first, focusing on accurate, automated payouts and rep transparency, may find Xactly Incent a good fit.
Enterprises seeking broader sales planning for territories, quotas, and scenario modeling can often achieve that through Xactly’s broader portfolio or custom design work. Still, those needs may require additional design effort beyond core commission automation.
According to recent G2 reviews:
What Users Like |
What Users Flag |
Automation of commission calculations reduces manual effort and errors, thereby improving accuracy and efficiency. |
Slow loading and sync delays at times, especially around reporting or maintenance windows. |
Real-time data and visibility into earnings and attainment. |
Insufficient drill-down detail in specific reports and dashboards for some users. |
Ease of use for many end users; clear statements and UI. |
Slower updates and data freshness were noted by some reviewers. |
Integration with CRM systems, such as Salesforce, is frequently mentioned in positive reviews. |
Learning curve; “not intuitive” comments from a subset of users, often tied to specific workflows. |
CaptivateIQ is a commission and incentives platform that focuses on automating calculations, providing sellers with clear payout visibility, and enabling administrators to manage plans using familiar, spreadsheet-style logic.
The company also markets CaptivateIQ Planning for territory carving and quota setting.
Teams that are earlier in their compensation maturity or smaller groups seeking a user-friendly way to automate commissions with spreadsheet-style logic often find CaptivateIQ a good fit.
As planning and data complexity expand, for example, multi-scenario forecasting or territory governance, organizations may layer additional tooling.
According to recent G2 reviews:
What Users Like |
What Users Flag |
User-friendly, intuitive user interface (UI) that makes commission tracking straightforward. |
Slow loading or data freshness issues are reported by some teams, especially during heavy periods. |
Helpful support and smooth onboarding experiences in many accounts. |
Reporting and analytics limitations, as well as requests for deeper drill-downs. |
Spreadsheet-style formulas that feel familiar to admins. |
Missing or desired features as teams scale, resulting in more manual steps or additional add-ons. |
Good fit for smaller teams, formalizing compensation. |
Advanced planning and forecasting, as well as territory complexity, may require additional tools or custom work (inferred from G2 themes). |
Use the checklist below to evaluate options with enterprise realities in mind. Each item includes what to check, how to verify in a live demo, and a Varicent example for context.
If planning windows are short and territories shift mid-cycle, use a platform that previews the consequences before anything is published. These can include showing quota gaps, forecast and payout impact, and seller coverage, so that leaders can approve effective-dated changes with fewer disputes and cleaner audits.
Across this guide, a pattern emerged: Enterprise teams tend to achieve the best results when planning, data, forecasting, and compensation remain connected, and when AI is integrated into the workflow rather than bolted on.
Here’s a simple way to move from research to proof:
Directional fit, as indicated by the review data, can also help narrow your shortlist. COE-led organizations with dedicated model builders may favor a connected-planning approach. CRM-standardized teams often extend their platform for advanced planning.
Comp-first teams may start with commission automation. Smaller teams formalizing compensation may begin with tools that feel familiar and simple to administer.
Enterprise teams don’t have quarters to wait on service-heavy changes. If you need enterprise-grade scale, payout visibility during planning, and admin-owned agility, Varicent’s combination of Sales Planning, Incentives, Seller Insights, Artificial Intelligence, and ELT could be a match for your business.
The final step is yours: Take the checklist from this article into live demos and score each tool against the same tasks. If those tasks feel fast, traceable, and repeatable, you are likely choosing a platform that will support predictable and profitable revenue for your business.